Google has introduced Antigravity, a new development environment that is intentionally designed around agents. Instead of treating AI as a simple autocomplete helper, Antigravity brings a mission control layer for multiple AI agents into your workflow – with full transparency across editor, terminal and browser.
Across Europe, many teams are hitting a similar ceiling: you are asked to ship features faster, pay down technical debt and meet stricter compliance expectations. At the same time, classic IDEs and narrow AI assistants mostly focus on code completion – they rarely help you plan, coordinate and document complex work.
Typical pain points you might recognize:
of your time disappears into context switching between tickets, repositories, terminals and browsers.
are usually involved when you turn an idea into a feature branch and take it to production.
around what your AI assistant actually changed, why it changed it and how it was tested.
Antigravity aims to solve exactly this: it brings an agent-first architecture that lets AI agents own entire missions – from analysis to implementation – while keeping you in control through verifiable Artifacts.
Antigravity blends a familiar IDE experience with a powerful agent layer that has direct access to editor, terminal and an integrated browser. Gemini 3 Pro is the reference model, but you can also plug in Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GPT-based open-source models, depending on your needs.
Instead of agents acting in the dark, Antigravity surfaces their work as Artifacts: structured task lists, code diffs, screenshots and browser recordings. These units of work are easy to inspect and review, turning autonomous execution into a controlled, auditable process.
In Editor View, you stay inside a familiar IDE while an agent sits in the side panel – similar to Copilot, but with deeper context. The agent sees project structure, terminal output and browser state, so it can take on more complex tasks than plain completion.
Manager View acts as a mission control center where you orchestrate multiple agents working on different missions in parallel – for example refactoring, test coverage, documentation or research. You monitor progress, review Artifacts and decide what gets merged.
This combination positions Antigravity as a foundation for an agent-first future instead of a one-off productivity feature.
For European organizations, Antigravity is especially interesting because it connects productivity, governance and compliance. Rather than adding isolated AI features to existing toolchains, you get a unified platform where agent work becomes visible, reviewable and documentable.
Artifacts help you create an audit trail: which agent triggered which change, processed which data and proposed which decisions. This is valuable input for risk assessments, model governance and regulatory documentation.
Instead of ad-hoc scripts and prompts, you can define reusable missions – such as "modernize service", "improve test coverage" or "generate onboarding documentation" – and orchestrate them centrally.
Because Artifacts can contain not just code but also explanations, reports and visualizations, they make it easier for non-technical stakeholders to understand what agents are doing and to participate in review cycles.
With a public preview available on Windows, macOS and Linux, you can start with constrained pilots, validate value and gradually expand to more critical systems.
From a developer perspective, Antigravity is closer to a platform than a plug-in. It aims to support the full lifecycle from idea to maintenance.
Spin up agents with dedicated roles – implementation, testing, documentation, research – and orchestrate them from Manager View. Each mission produces Artifacts for review.
Agents can clone repositories, run builds, inspect logs, browse documentation and update code – all within one environment.
Mix Gemini 3 Pro with other models where it makes sense – for example, using one model for reasoning-heavy tasks and another for large-scale code generation.
Over time, Antigravity can reuse patterns from earlier missions so agents become more aligned with your architecture, conventions and review preferences.
If you treat Antigravity as a strategic component rather than a gadget, it can unlock measurable improvements.
Agents handle preparation work such as research, boilerplate code and initial tests. You invest more of your attention in design and review.
Reviewing Artifacts gives you more context than reviewing a raw diff – you also see assumptions, test steps and potential side effects.
New team members can explore missions and Artifacts to understand services, typical issues and architectural decisions much faster.
Once missions are defined and governed, you can reuse them across repositories and teams instead of writing custom scripts for each project.
Even in the current public preview, you can already imagine concrete scenarios where Antigravity adds value.
A cross-functional team defines a mission "modernize service X". Agents analyze the codebase, propose refactoring steps, generate tests and create Artifacts for each stage so senior engineers can review and decide.
Agents examine logging patterns, retention settings and monitoring dashboards, then propose a roadmap that aligns with GDPR and upcoming EU AI Act expectations for transparency and risk management.
Product teams use Antigravity to prototype agentic user experiences – for example in support, analytics or workflow automation – and keep a record of design decisions, experiments and test results in Artifacts.
Moving towards agent-first development is not just a tooling change. It has implications for governance, security and team culture.
You need clear rules: which missions can agents run autonomously, when is human approval mandatory and what is the escalation path if something looks risky?
Agents interacting with terminals and browsers must fit into your existing identity and access management. Apply least-privilege principles and ensure robust logging.
Developers need time and guidance to build trust in autonomous agents. Transparent Artifacts, training and a phased rollout help avoid resistance.
Antigravity has to integrate with your CI/CD pipelines, repositories, secrets management and observability stack. Pilot projects are key to discovering integration gaps early.
If you address these challenges intentionally, Antigravity can become a disciplined enabler for automation instead of just another tool.
A gradual, mission-based adoption pattern is usually more successful than big-bang rollouts.
Pick a non-critical service or internal tool. Define a clear mission such as "improve test coverage" or "reduce complexity in module X" and restrict what agents are allowed to do.
Work with legal, data protection and security stakeholders to define policies for agent usage. Use Artifacts as the backbone for documentation and risk assessments in line with GDPR and the EU AI Act.
Once you have evidence from pilots, you can introduce additional mission types – from bug triage to documentation automation – and expand Antigravity across teams in a structured way.
Antigravity is part of a broader shift in software engineering: from tools that assist individuals to platforms that coordinate teams of agents and humans.
Instead of managing thousands of tickets, you can define higher-level missions that combine planning, execution and learning – with agents doing much of the heavy lifting.
An IDE that knows your context, learns from your history and takes on repetitive tasks can make engineering work more focused and sustainable.
Organizations that adopt agentic platforms in a structured way can ship higher quality software faster – with better documentation and auditability – which is a real advantage in regulated industries.
Whether Antigravity becomes a turning point in automated software development depends largely on how you adopt it. If you frame it as a platform for governed agentic workflows rather than a shiny add-on, it can become a strategic asset.
If you treat Antigravity as a catalyst to rethink your development processes, it can become much more than "just another tool" – it can be a building block for an agent-first future.